Skip to content

Weekday Japan business intelligence for finance professionals.

Join the list
Tokyo Brief東 京 ブ リ ー フJapan's day, wrapped and delivered by morning.

Policy Watch

Regulator recommends Tokyo equipment maker settle late payments to 46 subcontractors

The JFTC found a Tokyo air-blast equipment maker paid 46 subcontractors late, by missing the 60-day limit, issuing bills and using electronic claims, worth ¥74.97mn in total, and recommended it pay the balance plus 14.6% interest after ¥64.93mn was paid by August.

By Tokyo Brief DeskSep 29, 20263 min read
Industrial machine parts beside payment bills and a ledger strip, illustrating late payments to small manufacturing subcontractors.

The Japan Fair Trade Commission (JFTC) recommended on September 29, 2026 that a Tokyo-based maker of air-blast equipment pay 46 small subcontractors what it still owed them. The commission found the company paid late, mostly by handing over electronic recorded claims that could not be exchanged for the full cash amount by the due date. The company has capital of ¥100mn and, at the time of the orders, employed more than 300 people.

Three payment methods, one violation

The company commissioned parts manufacturing from 44 subcontractors and transport of finished equipment from two. For 45 of them, payment was due at the end of the month after delivery or transport; for one, it was due at the end of the month after next. The JFTC counted three kinds of late payment, all under the ban on paying after the due date.

How the payments were late
Amounts are the delayed sums the JFTC attributes to each method. Together they make up the ¥74.97mn total; ¥64.93mn has since been paid.
Payment methodSubcontractorsAmount
Paid beyond 60 days after receipt1¥309,892
Bills5¥3.87mn
Electronic claims not convertible to full cash by due date40¥70.79mn

The JFTC dates the use of bills and electronic claims to February through May 2026. The three amounts add up to the ¥74.97mn the JFTC treats as delayed. The company has paid ¥64.93mn of that total by August 2026, so the paid sum sits inside the ¥74.97mn and is not an extra amount. The one subcontractor paid beyond 60 days and the five bill recipients were paid in full by July. Of the 40 electronic-claim recipients, the record shows payments to 38, excluding two.

What the company must do

The company must pay the remaining balance, after applying the ¥64.93mn already paid, once the JFTC has confirmed the amount. It must also pay late interest at 14.6% a year, counted from the 60th day after it received each subcontractor's delivery or service. If any of 45 subcontractors bore fees to receive the money, the company must reimburse them. Payment must be in cash or an equivalent means.

The recommendation also requires a board resolution confirming that the conduct broke the law and that future payments will fall due within 60 days of receipt, as early as possible. The company must take internal steps to prevent a repeat, such as training its purchasing staff on the law. It must also tell its officers, employees and subcontractors about the recommendation and report its steps to the JFTC.

Why the case is a test of the revised law

The Small and Medium Enterprise Agency's chief asked the JFTC to act on September 3, after the Kanto Bureau of Economy, Trade and Industry investigated. The JFTC says the revised law, in force since January 1, 2026, bans paying by bill and paying with electronic claims that cannot be swapped for the full amount by the due date. The revision also added an employee-count test, under which a contractor with 300 or fewer employees can qualify as protected. Twenty of the 46 subcontractors here qualified only through that test.

The JFTC's companion leaflet adds a second date: from April 1, 2027, manufacturing-type transactions outside the law's scope must also set payment due dates within 60 days of receipt.